High-resolution weather model output

AceCAST

GPU-accelerated WRF for forecasts that need to arrive in time to matter.

AceCAST brings NVIDIA GPU acceleration to Weather Research and Forecasting workflows, helping teams run high-resolution simulations faster while preserving the model detail their decisions depend on.

Acceleration
9x

Core AceCAST performance story for GPU-accelerated WRF workflows.

Resolution Path
1 km

Built for high-resolution domains where model detail affects decisions.

Model Foundation
WRF

Weather Research and Forecasting workflows accelerated for production use.

Standard WRF

CPU workflow
Standard WRF model output comparison

AceCAST GPU

Accelerated
AceCAST GPU-accelerated WRF model output comparison
NVIDIA GPU acceleration
High-resolution atmospheric simulations
Operational forecasting workflows
WRF-compatible model acceleration

What AceCAST Changes

Keep the WRF science. Change the operational clock.

AceCAST is for teams that already understand the value of physics-based forecasting but need faster turnaround, higher-resolution domains, or more practical production economics than traditional CPU-only runs can support.

Compute

Accelerate WRF execution

Move heavy physics-based forecast workloads onto GPU-accelerated infrastructure so runs finish sooner.

Resolution

Keep useful forecast detail

Support high-resolution workflows where spatial detail, timing, and local gradients matter to the user.

Operations

Fit production cadence

Help forecasting teams refresh outputs, test scenarios, and support recurring decision windows more practically.

Delivery

Connect to downstream products

Turn accelerated forecast output into dashboards, risk scoring, custom datasets, and operational feeds.

Performance Story

The benchmark matters because the forecast window is always closing.

AceCAST is not acceleration for its own sake. Faster WRF execution gives teams more room to refresh runs, test configurations, preserve high-resolution detail, and deliver output while it can still change the decision.

Runtime Comparison

CPU to GPU path
CPU versus GPU WRF runtime comparison

A shorter runtime changes what a forecast team can attempt before the operational deadline arrives.

What changes operationally

9x

More headroom before deadline

Large runtime gains can turn a single slow run into a more practical operating cycle.

GPU

Compute matched to the workload

NVIDIA GPU acceleration helps heavy WRF workloads use parallel compute more effectively.

WRF

Continuity for meteorology teams

Teams can focus on domains, physics, cadence, and delivery without abandoning familiar WRF workflows.

Operational Fit

Built for teams that need forecast compute to become a workflow advantage.

AceCAST supports teams that need physics-based model output to move faster through research, planning, validation, and production delivery.

Renewables

Wind and solar planning

Run higher-resolution forecasts for generation, ramp risk, and operational planning windows.

Forecast Teams

Regional model operations

Refresh high-resolution domains faster and support more practical recurring forecast cycles.

Research

Scenario and sensitivity work

Test configurations and cases without waiting through traditional CPU-only turnaround times.

Data Products

Downstream weather intelligence

Feed custom weather datasets, visual products, risk models, and operational decision systems.

Veer RenewablesClient Validation

Wind-energy validation without treating speed as a shortcut.

Veer Renewables evaluated AceCAST against traditional WRF output for wind forecasting. The validation story is not just faster runtime; it is faster runtime with output differences small enough to support real operational analysis.

5x

Speed improvement

Low

Output variance

Wind

Energy focus

Mean Wind Speed Difference

Mean wind speed difference validation between WRF and AceCAST

Validation graphic from the Veer Renewables analysis comparing WRF and AceCAST outputs.

Deployment Path

From model workload to operational run plan.

AceCAST conversations usually start with the workflow your team already runs: domain size, physics options, forecast horizon, cadence, hardware, and output needs.

01

Profile the run

Domain, resolution, physics, forecast horizon, cadence, and output requirements define the acceleration target.

02

Match compute path

We identify the right product path: AceCAST acceleration, AceCAST Cloud, or a custom production workflow.

03

Validate output behavior

Runtime improvements are reviewed alongside forecast-output differences and the decisions they support.

04

Operationalize delivery

Forecast outputs move into the files, APIs, viewers, dashboards, or recurring workflows your team needs.

Evaluate AceCAST

Request an AceCAST trial license with the context our team needs to review it.

The trial request helps us understand who you are, why AceCAST matters to your work, and how you plan to use it before our team reviews the request.

Trial justification
Organization details
$10 registration fee

Trial Request

What the form asks for.

The request form collects a detailed justification, organization details, intended use case, consultation preference, and the registration fee needed to submit the trial request for review.

Why

Why you are interested in AceCAST and how you plan to use it.

Who

Your name, company email, organization, website, and sector.

Review

Consultation preference, optional notes, and the $10 trial registration fee.